GIR Rule 2(a) Case study: Toyota’s HS misclassification in Thailand
Misclassification under GIR 2(a) can expose traders to severe financial and reputational harm. When goods are imported unassembled or disassembled, but retain the essential character of the finished product, they must be classified as the complete article. Failure to do so can result in substantial back duties, penalties, and legal disputes, as well as damage to commercial relationships and brand integrity. The following case illustrates how costly non-compliance with GIR 2(a) can be in practice.
Background
In 2022, the Thai Supreme Court imposed significant penalties on Toyota Motor Thailand for misclassifying imported parts for its Prius model. This case exemplifies the compliance challenges and financial implications of HS misclassification.
Details of the misclassification
Toyota classified the imported parts under HS code 8708, covering automobile parts, to leverage reduced tariff rates under the Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement (JTEPA). However, Thai Customs determined the parts should have been classified under HS code 8703.23.51, applicable to complete vehicles.
|
✘ CODE USED BY TOYOTA
HS 8708
Automobile parts
Chosen to leverage reduced tariff rates under the Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement (JTEPA).
|
|
✔ CODE DETERMINED BY THAI CUSTOMS
HS 8703.23.51
Complete vehicles
The parts retained the essential character of the finished vehicle, so GIR 2(a) applies.
|
Thai Customs applied General Rule of Interpretation (GIR) 2(a), which states that unassembled or disassembled products should be classified as complete products if they retain the essential character of the finished item.
Financial implications
- Total Liabilities: Approximately 11.63 billion baht (around USD 272.11 million) in back taxes and penalties.
- Penalty Breakdown: Included unpaid duties, interest, and fines under Thai customs law.
- Timeline: Payments were required within 30 days of the court ruling.
|